QMUL THESIS SUBMISSION FORM
Embargo your thesis If you do not wish your thesis to be available online and did not apply to restrict access to your thesis on the examination entry form you must also Request Thesis Embargo [DOC 44KB] at this point. Nomination of examiners and examination entry The process for examination entry and nomination of examiners is initiated by the student. Fee payments are taxable income and need to be logged as such. The links to the form and guidance notes are displayed under the ‘Examination’ heading. The joint report should be on a separate sheet and should include the following:. Examiners must not have any close connections or extensive recent within the past five years collaborations with either the supervisor s or student including joint publications or research grants which might inhibit a completely objective examination.
They are required to do this within two weeks of the viva. When the revised thesis is dispatched to the examiners the Research Degrees Office will ask them to confirm whether a further oral examination is required. You must not contact the examiners yourself. Examination of re-entry candidates Unless it is impossible for them to do so, it is expected that the original examiners will examine the candidate on re-entry. If the examiners wish to advise the candidate orally of their decision at the conclusion of their deliberations following the examination, they must make clear to the candidate that the result is not formal and final until confirmed and notified by letter from the College to the candidate. It is expected that each examiner will write their report after reading the thesis but before conferring with the co-examiner about it.
Examination of re-entry candidates Unless it is impossible for them to do so, submissuon is expected that the original examiners will examine the candidate on re-entry. The report should have regard to the requirements of a thesis for the relevant research degree.
If nominating two external examiners, please enter the details of the lead examiner in the section for examiner 1 on the nominations form. By signing this declaration and entering the examination, you authorise Queen Mary to make your thesis publically available on the open-access institutional e-repository, Queen Mary Research Online QMROaccording to the conditions set out in the declaration. If you will not be able to work on your research programme at all for period of time it may be more appopriate to request permission to interrupt your studies.
The candidate is responsible for ensuring that the work is carried out to the required standard. Examiners will be advised of any such arrangements with their appointment letters.
Nomination of examiners and examination entry – Academic Registry and Council Secretariat
Individuals who were previously members of staff, students or other members of Queen Mary University of London must not be appointed as an external examiner until a period of three years has elapsed. The revisions required might include re-conceptualisation of and amendment to the arguments and conclusions of the thesis, and additional research work may need to be undertaken.
Where the research was supported by more than one agency, the different agencies should be separated by a semi-colon, with “and” before the final funder.
The outcome will need to be ratified by the Fork Degrees Progression and Examinations Board which is held once a month. This is why the personal details form asks for information such as date of birth. Extensions can be granted in periods of whole months and on one occasion only.
Pass; Pass subject to minor amendments to be completed and checked by one or both examiners within three months; Pass subject to major amendments to be completed and checked by one or both examiners within nine months or within a period specified fhesis the examiners if less than nine months are required.
Examiners should not consider option g unless they have first considered and rejected as inapplicable the preceding options; and should not consider option h unless they have previously considered and rejected as inapplicable all the previous options Thedis the decision Examiners are required to complete the Outcome of Examination form indicating which of the available decisions they have made qkul write a joint report giving the grounds on which their decision is based.
You must not contact the examiners yourself.
This should be done within two weeks of the examination. The educational needs provisions of the Disability Discrimination Act require institutions to make reasonable adjustments for candidates with physical and special learning submisssion in their assessment. Students who have changed their mode of study from full-time to part-time and vice versainterrupted their studies, or have been granted an extension to their period of registration will have a different thesis submission deadline to the guide above.
The following two options will be considered corm the Research Degree Programmes and Examination Board:. Examination entry and nomination of examiners are considered by the Research Degrees Programmes and Examinations Board. Individuals who have retired from academic positions at Queen Mary University of London or another higher education institution may be appointed as internal or external examiners if they remain active in their field of research.
Submissjon d — not pass, but revise and resubmit — is the outcome that should be specified when the thesis presented, in the opinion of the examiners, does not meet the criteria for the gorm, but might do so following a significant period of re-working and revision. Please note that extensions will be considered only if you can provide evidence of your foem progress to date and ability to submit within the requested time period, and will be approved only if the Dean for Research determines that:.
Examiners must not have any close connections or extensive recent within the past five years collaborations with either the supervisor s or student including joint publications or research grants which might inhibit a completely objective examination. A student and their supervisor should discuss the appropriate timing of examination entry and the nomination of examiners to read the thesis and conduct the viva voce examination before fform student completes their part of their form and before submitting your thesis.
If examiners are informed directly by quml supervisor or candidate of any disability they should seek the advice of the Research Degrees Office. Please note that in order to demonstrate suubmission eligibility to work in the European Union, all examiners must provide a copy of the picture page of their passport along with a copy of any work permit for those requiring a permit.
Examiners should be experts in the field of the thesis but not necessarily in all parts of the precise topic. Option c — pass tesis to major amendments — is the outcome that should be specified when the corrections required are more significant in nature, including the re-writing or re-structuring of significant parts of the thesis and the clarification of arguments.
Forms and Guidance Notes
Arrangements for the examination The purpose of the oral examination is to examine the candidate on the subject of the thesis and relevant subjects. If you have any queries about the viva, please speak to your supervisor in the first instance.
There are eight possible outcomes: Pass; Pass subject to minor amendments to be completed and checked by one or both examiners within three months; Pass subject to major amendments to be completed and checked by one or both examiners within nine months or within a period specified by the examiners if less than nine months are required.
The examiners are informed if this is the case. Notification to the candidate If the examiners wish to advise the candidate orally of their decision at the conclusion of their deliberations following the examination, they must make clear thesjs the candidate that the result is not formal and final until confirmed and notified by letter from the College to the candidate.